Saturday, October 5, 2013

Civil Rights



The Beginning to an End

1963: A Year of Change 

In the summer of 1963 a pivotal event occurred that did not only affect the state of Alabama, but the entire nation.


George C. Wallace presidential
campaign pin, 1968.
George C. Wallace, governor of Alabama in 1963, was well known for his political power and objective to “stand up for America.” Wallace expressed just how far he would go to reach his goal on June 11, 1963.

Vivian Malone and James Hood, two capable students, visited the University of Alabama that summer in hopes of enrolling for classes. Both students were fit candidates to be admitted into the university, except they were African American. As the students marched up to the Alabama schoolhouse door, Wallace blocked their entrance. 



George C. Wallace standing at the entrance of the University 
of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, Ala.
Photo by AP Images, June 11, 1963
“It is this right which I assert for the people of Alabama by my presence here today,” Wallace said as he stood at the entrance of the University of Alabama on June 11, 1963.

Wallace’s actions and his “Stand in the Schoolhouse Door” speech went down in history and forever changed the United States.

The event went viral in newsrooms across the nation when President John F. Kennedy wrote an executive order directed at Wallace.

“That order called for the admission of two clearly qualified young Alabama residents,” Kennedy stated in his speech on June 11, 1963, “who happened to have been born Negro.”

Journalists knew the event would not just affect Alabama but the United States as a whole.


Coverage Across the Nation



National Guard Brig. Gen. Henry Graham addressing Gov. 
George C. Wallace at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa.
Photo by AP Images June 11, 1963

The New York Times and The Dallas Morning News are just two of the major publications that covered the story on June 11, 1963. Although the stories contain similar facts they were presented in very different ways.



The Dallas Morning News front-page headline read, “Moment of Decision Nears for Wallace,” and presented an image of Wallace with government officials.

The New York Times (NYT) presented the story regarding Wallace and the University of Alabama in a different light.

The headline read, “President Urges Wallace to Shun Alabama Campus,” but did not add a photo. Instead NYT focused on Kennedy’s comments regarding the Cold War.


The Dallas Morning News approached the story emphasizing Wallace’s role rather than Kennedy’s. The front-page story is not continued throughout the newspaper, although The Dallas Morning News does write a second story found on its the front-page titled, “ ‘Stay Away’ J.F.K Asks.”




President John Kennedy broadcasting his nation-wide 
speech on civil rights in the White House.
Photo by AP Images June 11, 1963
“‘Stay Away’ J.F.K Asks” focuses on Kennedy’s telegram sent to Wallace days before the event occurred.



“I, therefore, urgently ask you to consider the consequences to your state and its fine university if you persist in setting an example of defiant conduct,” Kennedy said.

The NYT story took a different spin and described how the nation would be affected instead of describing the consequences Wallace and University of Alabama would face.

“The civil rights proposals are expected to include a ban on discrimination by stores, restaurants, theatres and other businesses dealing in interstate commerce,” said the NYT on June 11, 1963, Page 4.  

Finding Common Ground



The disparities in coverage between the New York Times and The Dallas Morning News could be because of the proximity of Tuscaloosa, Alabama as well as the different political views found in the two states. Regardless of the differences the story was seen as an important event nationwide.


Vivian Malone and James Hood answering questions during a news 
conference after registering for their classes at the 
University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, Ala.
Photo by AP Images June 11, 1963
    
"[The Nation] was founded on the principle that all men are created equal,” Kennedy said, quoting the U.S. Constitution during his June 11, 1963, speech regarding the event that took place at the University of Alabama, “and that the rights of every man are diminished when the rights of one man are threatened.”

 








Danielle Harkness is a junior at Texas State University majoring in journalism and Spanish.





Civil rights sees 50th anniversary of tragedies and triumphs

By: Michael C. Seabrooke
October 3, 2013
My goal for this assignment was to compare how local Alabama papers covered civil rights news in their time - 1963 for the 50th anniversary this year - with their northern neighbor, the New York Times, in a search for which area gives more attention to black events.
Emphasis in this project was placed on the following 1963 events: the murder of Medgar Evers (head of NAACP), 6/12/63; Martin Luther King, Jr.’s March on Washington, 8/28/63; possible inclusions of MLK’s arrest in Birmingham, Alab. earlier that year on 4/16/63.  Lastly, I found a surprise while hunting for information in the New York Times for Malcom X’s two-hour speech at the Unity Rally in Harlem, 6/29/63.  The library archives at Texas State University, understandably, do not keep newspapers from other states like Alabama and Mississippi, so I placed my emphasis on the New York Times.   The following is an analysis of my findings.


Front page, New York Times, 6/13/1963

The Thursday, June 13th, 1963 issue of the New York Times hosted news on the assassination of Medgar Evers.  Evers was shot in the back with a high powered rifle while walking from his car to his home in Jackson, Mississippi on June 12th.  A suspect was picked up in a matter of hours, questioned, and released.  The NYT did not feel this was any more newsworthy than the cold war brewing with Russia, or the Profumo inquiry in London.  All three major stories shared near equal space on the top of A1 in the NYT that day.  The Medgar Evers article did not even receive a photo.  I am hoping this was because the publication was run on short notice, when no photos were readily available for the murder across the country.  Evers was shot around 11pm on June 12th, and died in the hospital at 1am June 13th, just hours before the article ran in the Times.

Medgar Evers, state secretary for NAACP, Aug. 9, 1955
in Jackson, Miss. (APimages.com)
 Monday, July 29th, 1963 showed A1 coverage of the blacks picketing the mayor’s office in NYC and being arrested.  Even this local headline was still not important enough to receive photographic coverage.  Instead, the much happier news of Jackie O’s birthday and Caroline Kennedy jumping from her father’s private yacht in Hyannis Port, Mass. received a large photo on the front page, with the news of black picketers off to the side, almost sandwiched between the personal Kennedy story, and news of the President sending a message to Kruschev.


Perhaps the decision to include photos on the civil rights subject wasth, 1963 issue was filled with a large image of volunteers packing 80,000 lunches for the marchers a day earlier.  ‘CAPITAL IS READY FOR MARCH TODAY; 100,000 EXPECTED’ read the headline.  They were close on that estimate!  Just multiply by two…
purely numbers based.  Apparently 200,000 participants is enough to gain photographic attention on the front page of the Times, because the Wednesday, August 28
6,000 police were assigned to the event, and liquor stores were banned from selling alcohol in the area that day.  Page 21 of the same NYT issue covered the march route with a map of D.C., and coverage of the starting location at the Washington Monument.  Elsewhere in the south, this large an event would have been a disaster.  Fortunately no angry rioters or protestors disturbed the mass of people, and the event is long remembered as having been a truly peaceful union of citizens seeking racial equity.
The Times redeemed itself on August 29th, 1963, with two gigantic pictures showing as many of the 200,000 participants as the camera could absorb in one frame; one shot was from the Washington Monument, the other taken from atop the Lincoln Memorial.  The headline read ‘200,000 MARCH FOR CIVIL RIGHTS IN ORDERLY WASHINGTON RALLY; PRESIDENT SEES GAIN FOR NEGRO’.


Front page, New York Times, 6/29/1963

The lede read: “More than 200,000 Americans, most of them black but many of them white, demonstrated here today for a full and speedy program of civil rights and equal job opportunities.  It was the greatest assembly for a redress of grievances that this capital has ever seen.”



My only true disappointment (and half my reason for using the Times for this assignment) was in seeking their coverage of the Unity Rally in Harlem on June 29th, 1963.  I scoured the Times on microfilm from June 28th-30th and found no coverage of the event.  Since this took a good deal of time to locate (unsuccessfully), I pulled up the actual speech and listened to the first fifteen minutes with headphones while I worked.


Photo credit: www.blackyouthproject.com
Malcom was an amazing public speaker and motivator with some very unique views on the subject of integration, but his Unity Rally speech, two hours long in Mecca in April 1964, where he saw Muslims of all colors and races sharing a common purpose, and realized Islam could be his vessel for working through racial controversy back home.  Despite the unflattering words against whites at the Unity Rally, it was surprising the Times chose not cover the second largest racial protest on record that transpired in their own backyard.
total, did not speak well of his fellow white citizens.  Malcom’s view of whites in society did not evolve until his trip to

Links showing present-day tributes to the Anniversary:







Michael Seabrooke is a senior at Texas State University, majoring in journalism.  He lives in Austin, TX and can be reached at: mcs104@txstate.edu.



Martin Luther King Jr. shot to death in Memphis hotel

Civil rights leader gone but not forgotten

1964 marked the start of a monumental few years for the United States. The beginning of the Civil Rights Movement brought forward thousands of courageous black men and women who fought, sometimes to death, for their own freedom and equal rights. One of those brave people was Martin Luther King Jr. who, to this day, is still known for his nonviolent role in the advancement of the Civil Rights movement.  Back in the day, Martin Luther King Jr. was no stranger to the newspaper headlines and TV and radio newscasts. Newspapers from both the Northern and Southern part of the United States were well-versed when it came to covering stories about Martin Luther King Jr.; but they chose to do it in somewhat different ways. On April 4, 1968, Martin Luther King Jr. was shot and killed while standing on the balcony of his hotel room in Memphis, Tennessee. The headlines the day following King’s death was as predicted: all about the assassination and who did it.




Martin Luther King stands with Hosea Williams, 
Jesse Jackson and Ralph Abernathy on the balcony of the 
Lorraine Motel on April 3, 1968, a day before 
he was assassinated at approximately the same place.  
Associated Press
The New York Times, obviously a Northern paper, chose to cover King’s untimely death in a seemingly distant manner. The front page on Friday, April 5, 1968 read: “MARTIN LUTHER KING IS SLAIN IN MEMPHIS; A WHITE IS SUSPECTED; JOHNSON URGES CALM.” Although the all caps headline does convey a message of urgency, there is something about the way “SLAIN” is used, and also the way they chose to include “A WHITE IS SUSPECTED” that could lead an audience to believe that it wasn’t as big of a deal as others may have made it seem. “Slain” is a very graphic word, and even though the meaning behind it is true and does match up to what actually happened to King, the word “slain” and phrase, “A white is suspected,” don’t do the
dramatic event justice when used together. To some, the word “slain” may not have the same affect, as there isn’t any responsibility behind it. When you read the word “shot,” or the phrase “shot and killed,” then the mind automatically processes that there is someone else that is responsible and we want to know who it is. In this case, it was “a white.” The way that “white” is so loosely used, gives the impression that it was okay because it was a white person and white people were able to get away with so much mistreatment back in the day.





Andrew Young, Civil rights leader, and others on the
 balcony of the Memphis hotel, point in the direction 
where gunshots came from after the assassination 
of Martin Luther King Jr. Associated Press
In comparison to The New York Times, the Dallas Morning News front page also held a headline regarding the death of Martin Luther King Jr. that read: “Assassin’s Bullet Kills Dr. King.” Unlike The New York Times’ all caps headline, The Dallas Morning News opted to go with what an upstyle headline. This approach seems to be a bit odd, as the news was huge and not just another day in the United States. A man who continuously made history was shot to death and I don’t think this headline gives it the proper urgency and importance that it deserves. It can also be noted that according to this headline, it was the assassin’s bullet that killed King, not just the assassin himself. Similar 
to how the word “slain” was used in The New York Times’ headline, there is no responsibility behind who committed this awful crime. The headline for The Dallas Morning News doesn’t look any different than any other day, even though it should. The layout is the same as if it were just another typical day with no breaking news to share; the picture shown of King is small and doesn’t do him any justice at all. This man deserved to have his story told and it is almost offensive that this newspaper didn’t make it a bigger deal on their headline.







Nicolle Beltz is a senior at Texas State University majoring in journalism.




 

No comments:

Post a Comment